July 08, 2025
The recent data on civil rights complaints highlights the significant impact of workforce reductions, according to advocates. The department asserts that it is diligently fulfilling its obligations.
Between March 11 and June 27, the Office for Civil Rights (OCR) within the Education Department dismissed over 3,400 complaints, a number that advocates describe as alarming and unprecedented.
This information, revealed in court documents last week, provides insight into the office’s operations following substantial layoffs initiated by the Education Secretary, which resulted in nearly half of OCR’s staff being let go and the closure of seven regional offices. A federal judge has since intervened, halting these layoffs and mandating the reinstatement of the terminated employees.
Advocates, students, and families have expressed concerns that these layoffs have severely weakened OCR’s ability to safeguard civil rights for students. In various court documents and public statements, officials from the department have countered that the layoffs were intended to eliminate inefficiencies and that OCR remains capable of fulfilling its legal responsibilities.
“OCR has implemented significant measures to optimize its operations in response to demand. For instance, in light of an increasing number of Title IX complaints, OCR has collaborated with the Department of Justice to expedite investigations into sex-based discrimination,” stated an agency spokesperson. “The achievements of OCR under the current administration contradict the exaggerated fears propagated by some media outlets, demonstrating that OCR is actively committed to protecting the civil rights of all Americans.”
Since March 11, OCR has received a total of 4,833 complaints and initiated 309 investigations, as reported by the department’s chief of staff. Additionally, OCR has launched 26 “directed investigations” that are not tied to specific complaints. Out of the total complaints, 3,424 were dismissed in accordance with OCR’s Case Processing Manual, which outlines the procedures for handling complaints and investigations. According to this manual, complaints may be dismissed if they do not indicate a legal violation or lack sufficient factual detail regarding the alleged discrimination.
OCR continues to conclude investigations, having resolved 96 complaints due to insufficient evidence and reached voluntary agreements or settlements in 290 cases.
This pace of resolution is notably slower compared to the previous administration, as highlighted by a former OCR leader. During the last three months of the previous administration, OCR achieved 595 mediated or voluntary resolutions, dismissed 2,527 cases, and found no violations in 119 instances. Officials from the previous administration frequently emphasized the need for more staff to manage the increasing caseload.
“The high number of dismissals coupled with the low resolution figures indicates a troubling decline in the office’s productivity,” she remarked, noting that the 290 resolutions reflect a significant reduction in output from OCR.
The chief of staff did not elaborate on the reasons behind the dismissals or the nature of the violations involved. Typically, the department provides more detailed information about OCR’s complaints and investigations in its annual reports and budget discussions. The current administration has proposed a substantial cut to OCR’s budget, reducing it from $140 million to $91 million. Federal officials have previously committed to addressing OCR’s backlog of cases this year.
Tracey Vitchers, the executive director of a national organization focused on combating campus sexual assault, noted that during the previous administration, there was a noticeable slowdown in case processing times. While complaints were dismissed, the current volume of dismissals is unprecedented.
“The sheer number of cases dismissed in recent months is alarming and raises questions about the decision-making process and the criteria being used to justify these dismissals,” she stated.
Vitchers believes that the dismissals are a direct consequence of the layoffs, which likely resulted in longer investigation times unless the department effectively managed the workload of the remaining staff.
She expressed concern that the downsizing of OCR aligns with a broader agenda to diminish the department’s role, although she admitted uncertainty regarding the motivations behind the dismissals due to a lack of transparency from the department.
“Ultimately, this situation means that over 3,400 incidents have been dismissed, where students felt they were wronged, and the Office for Civil Rights has chosen to disregard their claims,” she concluded. “This outcome signifies a betrayal for students who believed they could rely on the institution to uphold their rights.”
Editorial Webcast
Discover how educational institutions can effectively support older learners—those aged 35 and above—a motivated yet underserved demographic.
