The president of George Mason University, Gregory Washington, continues to hold his position despite ongoing scrutiny and concerns regarding multiple federal investigations into allegations of racial discrimination and antisemitism. Washington has publicly defended his actions and leadership amidst these challenges.
During a recent meeting, the Board of Visitors at GMU convened to evaluate Washington’s performance and sought legal advice regarding potential litigation. Although the specifics of the legal matters were not disclosed, the university is currently under investigation by both the U.S. Department of Education and the Department of Justice for claims related to discriminatory hiring practices and antisemitism. Notably, the DOJ has initiated an investigation into the Faculty Senate after it expressed support for Washington’s leadership.
Washington’s comments following the tragic death of George Floyd in 2020 have drawn attention, particularly his commitment to hiring a diverse faculty and promoting an antiracist agenda. These statements have been scrutinized by some political figures, who have labeled his initiatives as “illegal DEI” efforts.
In his defense, Washington highlighted the progress GMU has made since his arrival in 2020, a time marked by heightened racial tensions. He addressed the board, emphasizing the university’s improved rankings and increased state funding, despite calls from students and faculty to remove a statue of the university’s founder, who had owned slaves.
Many within the community expressed concern that Washington, the first Black president of GMU, might be dismissed due to the ongoing investigations. They fear that the Board of Visitors, which includes several conservative members, may use these inquiries as justification for his removal. Supporters of Washington gathered at a rally, drawing parallels to other university leaders who have recently been ousted under similar pressures.
After a lengthy closed session, the board emerged with a decision to grant Washington a 1.5 percent salary increase, indicating that he will remain in his role for the time being, despite the faculty’s apprehensions.
Community Support for Washington
At the rally, faculty, students, and local officials united to advocate for Washington, urging the Board of Visitors to resist what they viewed as illegitimate federal investigations that threaten academic freedom. They called for the preservation of diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives at GMU, which is recognized as Virginia’s most diverse university. However, the board countered these demands by passing a resolution to eliminate race-conscious hiring and related programs.
Despite uncertainty surrounding Washington’s future, rally speakers encouraged attendees to remain steadfast in their support. One speaker emphasized the importance of continuing the fight for the university’s values, highlighting the personal safety concerns faced by faculty members.
Former board member Bob Witeck, who played a role in Washington’s hiring, praised his leadership qualities and warned against the dangers posed to academic freedom and inclusivity at GMU. He firmly stated that discrimination and political interference should not be tolerated within the institution.
While some speakers expressed support for Washington, others voiced criticism. A student leader raised concerns about Washington’s handling of pro-Palestinian speech on campus, urging him to resist political pressures and work towards a more inclusive future.
Tensions Between the Board and Faculty
Although the board did not publicly disclose the details of their closed session discussions, a confrontation between a board member and a faculty member highlighted the existing tensions. A professor’s protest sign advocating for Washington’s support prompted a heated exchange with a board member, who questioned the faculty’s stance on Washington’s conduct.
Following this encounter, the professor expressed her desire for the board to prioritize the university’s interests amid what she described as politically motivated investigations. She emphasized the need for the Board of Visitors to protect GMU from external political agendas.
As the situation unfolds, the uncertainty surrounding the board’s direction raises questions about their commitment to the university’s mission and the well-being of its community.