Department of Education Urges Action Against Columbia University

June 04, 2025

In a significant move, the Department of Education has urged Columbia University’s accrediting body to take decisive action regarding alleged civil rights violations. This call comes amid claims that the university is not adhering to essential accreditation standards.

The Department has publicly requested the Middle States Commission on Higher Education to investigate Columbia University for potential breaches of federal nondiscrimination laws. This request highlights the ongoing scrutiny of the university’s practices and its commitment to ensuring a safe and equitable environment for all students.

In a recent announcement, officials stated that Columbia has shown “deliberate indifference” towards the harassment faced by Jewish students, which they argue constitutes a violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Department emphasized that the university has not adequately protected these students from severe harassment, thereby denying them equal access to educational opportunities mandated by law. Consequently, the Department has called for the accrediting body to take appropriate measures.

Education Secretary Linda McMahon criticized Columbia for its failure to safeguard Jewish students, particularly in light of the recent terrorist attacks against Israel. She asserted that such negligence is not only unethical but also illegal, urging the accrediting body to ensure compliance with established standards.

McMahon further stated that accreditors have a responsibility to enforce compliance among their member institutions and requested that the Middle States Commission keep the Department informed about any actions taken against Columbia. The Department has indicated that it expects Columbia to formulate a comprehensive plan to address these compliance issues.

In response to the Department’s announcement, the president of the Middle States Commission, Heather Perfetti, acknowledged receipt of the letter regarding Columbia. She confirmed that the commission would process the findings in accordance with its established policies and procedures, reflecting a commitment to uphold accreditation standards.

This latest development is part of a broader initiative by the current administration to address concerns regarding Columbia’s handling of campus protests and related activities following the recent conflict in the Middle East. The university has previously made concessions to the administration’s demands, including revising disciplinary processes and enhancing campus security measures, despite ongoing debates about academic freedom.

Columbia has also faced significant financial repercussions, with the administration freezing substantial federal research funding as part of its efforts to enforce compliance. This action underscores the serious implications of the university’s current standing with federal authorities.

University officials have publicly acknowledged the concerns raised by the Department of Education and expressed their commitment to combating antisemitism on campus. They have stated that they are actively working with federal authorities to address these issues and ensure a safe environment for all students.

The announcement from the Department of Education has generated mixed reactions online, with some individuals mistakenly interpreting it as a loss of accreditation for Columbia. However, it is important to clarify that the federal government does not possess the authority to revoke accreditation; this decision lies solely with the accrediting bodies.

(This article has been updated to include statements from the Middle States Commission and Columbia University.)

In conclusion, the ongoing dialogue surrounding accreditation and compliance highlights the need for universities to uphold their commitments to civil rights and create inclusive environments for all students. The actions taken by the Department of Education serve as a reminder of the critical role that accreditation plays in maintaining educational standards and protecting student rights.

Leave a Comment