In an unexpected twist, the successful IPO of Figma has garnered attention from Lina Khan, the former chair of the Federal Trade Commission. Her remarks highlight the significance of allowing startups to flourish independently, rather than being absorbed by larger corporations.
On a recent Friday, Khan took to social media to share a link to an article detailing Figma’s remarkable debut on the stock market. She emphasized that this event serves as a powerful reminder of the immense value generated when startups are permitted to evolve into self-sustaining entities, rather than being acquired by established industry giants.
Khan’s comments reference a failed $20 billion acquisition attempt by a major software company, which was halted due to regulatory challenges. The deal faced obstacles not only from European regulators but also from U.S. authorities, who expressed concerns that such a merger could stifle competition and hinder Figma’s ability to compete effectively.
During her tenure as FTC chair, Khan was known for her rigorous approach to scrutinizing mergers and acquisitions, particularly those involving tech startups. This led to a trend where companies sought to circumvent regulatory challenges by opting for alternative strategies, such as hiring key personnel from startups instead of pursuing outright acquisitions.
Despite facing backlash from various sectors of the tech industry, Khan stood firm in her belief that a competitive landscape with multiple potential buyers would ultimately benefit entrepreneurs and foster innovation. She argued that only a small fraction of deals were subjected to thorough examination, advocating for a marketplace where startups could thrive.
Although Khan resigned from her position at the FTC with the onset of a new administration, her recent comments regarding Figma’s IPO suggest a sense of vindication for her regulatory stance. She characterized the IPO as a significant victory for employees, investors, and the broader innovation ecosystem.
However, critics of Khan’s approach may interpret Figma’s success as a result of its own innovative strategies rather than the regulatory scrutiny it faced. Analysts have pointed out that the company’s growth trajectory is primarily attributable to its unique offerings and market positioning, rather than the influence of regulatory oversight.
In conclusion, the Figma IPO serves as a pivotal moment in the ongoing discussion about the balance between regulatory oversight and fostering innovation in the tech industry. As the landscape continues to evolve, the implications of such events will undoubtedly shape future policies and practices in the realm of mergers and acquisitions.
Upcoming Tech Event
San Francisco | October 27-29, 2025